August 11, 2009
Racism in health care bill seen by US Commission on Civil Rights
The US Commission on Civil Rights is proving a thorn in the side of the Obama administration. First it has problems with Attorney General Eric Holder's Justice Department dropping of the New Black Panther voter rights intimidation case. Now it sees the House health care bill having provisions that are racially discriminatory.
How? By making overt a preference to award billions of taxpayer dollars and preferential treatment to minority students for scholarships, and favoring medical schools that have a record of sending graduates to areas with inadequate health care services. Jennifer Haberkorn of the Washington Times has an exclusive story:
In a draft of a letter the commission approved Friday, the group raises constitutional questions about giving preferential treatment to minority students for scholarships, and about favoring medical schools and organizations that have a record of sending graduates to areas with inadequate health care services."These programs are unlikely to reduce health care disparities among racial and ethic groups," according to the draft letter obtained by The Washington Times. "A growing body of evidence indicates that increasing access to high-quality physicians - whatever their racial or ethnic ancestry - is the best way to mitigate such disparities."The draft letter also cites testimony from Dr. Amitabh Chandra of Harvard University who said the idea that expanding the number of minority physicians and providing "cultural competence training" will bridge the health status gap is "grounded in hope more than science," according to the draft language.It cites research from Dr. Chandra that found that improving the quality of health care in the 500 largest minority serving areas would improve minority health care more than the elimination of racial disparities within every provider in the U.S.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Democrats Stand for Ukraine but Sit for America
- A Friend for Trump in Italy
- Trump’s Digital Fort Knox: Bitcoin, the Dollar, and America’s Financial Future
- K–12: At Last, Academics Acknowledge the Reading Crisis
- Donald Trump’s ‘America First’ Policies Are The Only Path to True Economic Strength
- Auditioning for the Part of Trump's Worst Adversary
- Returning to an Earlier American Identity
- Will the MAGA Barbarian Invasion Succeed?
- A ‘Putin’s Puppet’ President? Obama’s Truly Shocking Record
- Faith, Hope, and Babies
Blog Posts
- A Democrat member of the House has a breakdown over biological reality
- Who murdered Jamie White?
- Surprise! Greenland election goes Trump's way
- New report: Civilians stop more active shooters than law enforcement
- In Brazil, they have to destroy the environment to ‘save’ it
- Tim Walz resurfaces to name ‘first victims’ of Trump tariffs
- Don’t get panicked by the dramatic stock market drops
- Trump buries Bidenflation
- Tesla charging stations ‘intentionally’ lit on fire in Massachusetts
- How has a health issue become a wedge issue?
- A theory of why the left lost
- Trump Derangement Syndrome spreading -- in an unusual way
- Mississippi struggles to pass conservative policy
- The other Diaz-Balart
- After a campaign of soft and silky ads, Ontario goes the Full Putin on electricity tariffs, vowing to shut the electricity off in three states