August 28, 2009
Massachusetts politics and the John Jay standard
The Federalist Paupers blog finds an interesting historical parallel for the situation in Massachusetts today, trying to rig the rules for choice of an interim senator to fill our Ted Kennedy's seat.
On the off-chance that Governor Patrick might have second thoughts about his participation in this (and on the even remoter chance that this blog-post reaches his desk) I refer him to the fine example set by Gov. John Jay of New York when he encountered a similar situation in 1800. That spring, New York Republicans won a startling victory over the Federalist incumbents in the state assembly and senate elections, largely due to the unparalleled politicking of Aaron Burr. Since New York's electoral college would be selected by the new legislature - and since winning New York was the key to Vice President Jefferson's electoral strategy later that year - the election had incredible national ramifications.Federalists, especially Alexander Hamilton, were horrified. Hamilton had worked as tirelessly as Burr had during the election - the two of them often debated publicly that winter and both spent election day literally running from polling station to polling station - though without the former's political ingenuity or light touch. But besides his personal humiliation at the polls, Hamilton was genuinely concerned about the fate of the country under Jefferson, whom he believed (and believed with reason) would drag the country into war with Britain and ruin the country's finances. [....]Jay, though also worried about the implications of a Jefferson presidency, was disgusted by his friend's request. He never responded, and simply filed the letter away with a brief note:Proposing a measure for party purposes which it would not become me to adopt.History is watching, Governor Patrick. Take note.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty
- The Obamas' podcast bombs
- Did Stacey Abrams’s NGO really get $2 billion for appliances to hand out to Americans?
- Mark Kelly exposes the hypocrisy behind the Democrats’ electric vehicle fixation
- Washington state attorney general is mad at sheriff's office for complying with federal law
- Can Trump and the team really win?