52 Seconds of Obama Unilaterally Disarming America
Watch the most incredible video yet on Obama's naive and dangerous policies:
In 52 seconds, he rattles off what an Obama presidency would mean for our national defense; slowing down of existing programs to build new weapons, cutting "tens of billions" of dollars in "wasteful" spending, scrapping missile defense completely, and setting up an "independent defense priority review board" (you can imagine the anti-defense liberals sitting on that board) to make sure we don't waste any money building "unnecessary" weapons.
That's not all. Obama wishes upon a star for a "nuclear free world" and to that end, he will not allow any new designs for nukes nor will be build any new ones. He wants to talk to the Russians about re-targeting our missiles and "deep cuts" in our nuclear arsenal.
This is dangerous and stupid. Slowing down current weapons projects only makes them more expensive over the long term (but it looks good politically because of the money saved up front). He calls the anti-missile system "unproven" - and thank God for that because the only way to "prove" that it works is to shoot down an incoming missile. Recent successes have been incredible - shooting down a target traveling at Mach 7 is no simple matter. And almost every test shows improvement.
Why scrap the system now after spending tens of billions of dollars and when we are close to success? Lunacy!
I shudder when I think his 1960's style liberal friends have a go at the defense budget. Considering the fact they don't think we face any threats, we'll be lucky to keep the Army band.
Then there's his pie in the sky notion of a nuclear free world. Everyone wishes for that. Heck, I wish that the moon was made of Velveeta cheese but wishing will never make it so. And somehow, I just can't picture him and Putin on the same page about much of anything. Obama, the charmer, the ideologue and Putin, the aggressive, canny, ruthless autocrat.
Maybe we can convince a grown up to hold his hand during those negotiations.
In effect, Obama wants to gut the military to make sure we never go to war again. He has said as much on the campaign trail. And if a time ever comes, God forbid, where we would find it necessary to project our power to the far flung corners of the earth in order to protect Americans or American interests under an Obama presidency, I fear the military would be forced to tell him that it wouldn't be possible.
Obama is McGovern, Carter, and John Kerry all rolled into one when it comes to maintaining and improving our defenses. He would be a disaster as president and this video shows very clearly why.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
- Trump Didn't Kill the Old World Order -- He Just Pronounced It Dead
- Dems 2025: Stalingrad II or Keystone Kops?
- Go, Canada! Breaking Up Is Not Hard to Do
- Is Australia Set to Become a Security Threat for the United States?
- The Imperial Judiciary Of The United States
- Sanders and AOC: 100 Years of Socialism
Blog Posts
- The disturbing things that happen when you abandon Biblical principles
- In California, an anguished Dem base urges its politicians to be more crazy
- A new low: Leftist terrorists damage the Tesla of a woman in a wheelchair, leaving her with repair costs
- A Tale of Two Families
- ‘Gruesome’ trans-ing of animals is the key to fine-tuning trans ‘care’
- New report: NYPD officer accused of spying for the Chinese…from the same building as the FBI field office
- Quebec to ban religious symbols in schools?
- Joe Biden can help Republicans
- Low-hanging fruit is not enough
- Trump Makes Coal Great Again
- Israel’s appearance in the JFK files does not connect it to JFK’s death
- Waiting for an investigation of COVID-19 crimes
- Has Women’s History Month served its purpose?
- Democrats and their digging
- Obesity epidemic: Sometimes, the most obvious answer is on the table