April 19, 2008
Obama and FARC
Investor's Business Daily, for which my admiration is great, has noticed something potentially very important in captured documents released by the government of our ally Colombia, currently fighting a Marxist guerilla insurgency commonly known by the initials FARC:
Admittedly, it pales compared with other material from the dead thug's computer - such as FARC efforts to obtain uranium or Hugo Chavez's $300 million support.But the little Obama reference within the 15 FARC letters released by the Colombian government signals a disturbing pattern of contacts with rogue actors. It's not the first time, and Obama has yet to distance himself.In a Feb. 28 letter, FARC chieftain Raul Reyes cheerily reported to his inner circle that he met "two gringos" who assured him "the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support 'Plan Colombia' nor will he sign the TLC (Free Trade Agreement)."Aside from some interesting possibilities about who these "gringos" are - a congressional delegation did visit Ecuador and an international leftist "congress" was held in Quito around this time - the real question is why anyone secretly consorting with FARC would be able to speak for presidential candidate Obama.
There is more, and readers should examine the entire IBD editorial. It raises some very important questions.
But one cannot jump to the conclusion that the gringos in question have any official connection to Obama. For all we know, they are American leftist radicals who believe that they know the real Obama in ways that ordinary American voters do not. Perhaps they read something into the aesthetics embraced by the campaign -- a sort of a nod and a wink to the radical left. Or perhaps they are familiar with Obama's background as an Alinsky-inspired community organizer. Or maybe Bill Ayers told them he is "one of us." Who knows where they got their ideas about Obama's real sympathies.
But whoever the gringos may be, the questions that IBD raises ought to be raised. Of course, any TV journalist brave enough to ask a hardball question now knows that Tom Shales and others of his ilk will savage them.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Danes and the Greenlanders: How They See Trump's America
- The USAID Case: Judge Amir Ali’s $2 Billion Defiance Escalates
- Terrifying Tariffs: Tax Policy as Back-Door Foreign Aid
- Dr. Marty Makary’s ‘Blind Spots’ Book Is At Odds With Established Findings
- Reforming the Kennedy Center
- Is ActBlue a Criminal Enterprise?
- America’s New Tough Love Foreign Policy
- Democrats Stand for Ukraine but Sit for America
- A Friend for Trump in Italy
- Trump’s Digital Fort Knox: Bitcoin, the Dollar, and America’s Financial Future
Blog Posts
- Schumer’s attempted shutdown will backfire bigly
- The Democrats are so passionate ...
- Biden and the U.S. Steel case
- Jay Bhattacharya's promise on vaccine safety
- MAGA moon over Greenland?
- Trump must designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization
- A Democrat member of the House has a breakdown over biological reality
- Who murdered Jamie White?
- Surprise! Greenland election goes Trump's way
- New report: Civilians stop more active shooters than law enforcement
- In Brazil, they have to destroy the environment to ‘save’ it
- Tim Walz resurfaces to name ‘first victims’ of Trump tariffs
- Don’t get panicked by the dramatic stock market drops
- Trump buries Bidenflation
- Tesla charging stations ‘intentionally’ lit on fire in Massachusetts