No Starvation for Fuel!

"No Blood for Oil" is a spurious rallying cry on the left, but apparently it is acceptable for the poor in the third world to starve so that American Eco-activists can feel self-righteous about driving "flex-fuel" vehicles.  According to the WORLD BANK:

"almost all of the increase in global maize production from 2004 to 2007 (the period when grain prices rose sharply) went for biofuels production in the U.S.

As reported in a commentary entitled "Food Crisis Shows How Bad Policies Can Be Deadly" by Kevin Hassett.

Couldn't this be considered imperialistic "food hegemony" caused by the activists who place slight disturbance of the caribou by oil drilling in Alaska over the nutrition of their fellow man. (By the way, I've always wondered why environmentalists care so much about disturbing caribou in Alaska but never express any concern for camels in Saudi Arabia.)

True regard for fellow humans who are now hungry and malnourished because the eco-activists have upset global food markets could be expressed in the slogan "No Starvation for Fuel!"
If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
Kristi Noem and the prison cell
Snow White: a bomb for the ages

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Is Dem Defector Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.