November 12, 2007
What's in a Name?
We've all heard that 2008 is shaping up to be a big year for Democrats at the polls.
But what about it being a big year for liberals?
Politico's David Kuhn points out that while Republicans proudly proclaim the fact that they are conservatives, Democrats are having to do verbal back flips in order to avoid tagging themselves with the dreaded "L" word.
No, not that "L" word. Rather, they can't seem to refer to themselves as what they truly are; liberals:
Hillary Rodham Clinton was asked this summer if she would describe herself as a “liberal.”Why don't the Republicans have this problem?
The Democratic front-runner shied away, saying the “word” — noticeably not using the word — has taken on a connotation that “describes big government. “I prefer the word ‘progressive,’” she said. It has a “real American meaning.”
Then she expanded the term to “modern progressive,” and, finally, clarified that she was a “modern American progressive.”
At a recent Republican debate, Rudy Giuliani referred to himself as a “conservative” four times in roughly the same time span — a minute or so — it took Clinton to reject the word “liberal” and embrace “progressive.”Nunberg quipped "“You can be as liberal as much as you like, if you are a Democrat, as long as you don’t call yourself a liberal."
In seven Republican debates this year the word “conservative” was used 100 times. In the seven Democratic debates the word “liberal” was used four times — not once by a candidate. “Conservative is identified with a sensibility,” Stanford University linguist Geoffrey Nunberg said.
And that seems to sum up the Democrat's dillemma. A recent Gallup poll found 40% of Americans identifying themselves as Democrats but only 23% proclaiming themselves "liberal.
Contrast that with only 30% of Americans identifying themselves as Republicans but fully 39% of the country saying they are conservative.
Even with George Bush's approval numbers in the pits, conservatism's attraction survives, probably because most people don't believe the President's brand of conservatism will last beyond his presidency.
It stands to reason then, that the GOP has a much better chance in 2008 if they nominate a conservative.
No wonder everyone is just a little worried about Rudy Giuliani as standard bearer.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs
- An eye for an eye, an order for order
- Peace on the Dnieper?
- Tesla protestor banner: 'Burn a Tesla, save democracy'
- Pro-abortionists amplify an aborton protest's impact